PENGARUH PERFORMANCE EXPECTANCY, EFFORT EXPECTANCY, DAN SOCIAL INFLUENCE TERHADAP BEHAVIORAL INTENTION PADA APLIKASI AJAIB

Authors

  • Siti Holipah Program Studi Bisnis Digital, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Rizki Syaban Mulyasaputra Program Studi Bisnis Digital, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Mohamad Badar Fadlilah Program Studi Bisnis Digital, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Shauqi Rizqulloh Mahmudi Program Studi Bisnis Digital, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Keywords:

Ajaib Sekuritas; Effort Expectancy; Behavioral Intention; Social Influence; Performance Expectancy.

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of digital technology, technology-based investment applications like Ajaib are becoming increasingly popular. This study aims to assess the influence of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Social Influence on Behavioral Intention to use the Ajaib application. The research employs a quantitative method with a survey approach using Google Forms, involving 124 respondents who have experience using the Ajaib application. Data analysis is conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the SmartPLS software. The results reveal that Effort Expectancy and Social Influence have a significant impact on Behavioral Intention, while Performance Expectancy does not have a significant effect. Additionally, Social Influence is found to significantly influence Performance Expectancy. These findings highlight the importance of ease of use and social influence in encouraging users’ intention to adopt investment applications. The practical implications of this study suggest that app developers should focus on these factors to boost user adoption.

References

Achiriani, P., & Hasbi, I. (2021). Pengaruh Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Perceived Risk, Perceived Cost Terhadap Behavioral Intention Pada Pengguna Dompet Digital Dana di Indonesia. E-Proceeding of Management, 8(1), 376–388.

Agung Edy Wibowo. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Behavioural Intention. Jurnal Elektronik REKAMAN (Riset Ekonomi Bidang Manajemen dan Akuntansi) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Galileo, 1.

Alhwaiti, M. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Application in the Post-Covid Era and Its Impact on Faculty Members’ Occupational Well-being and Teaching Self Efficacy: A Path Analysis Using the UTAUT 2 Model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2175110

Anugrah, Z., Suhaebah, L., Pramudita, T. R., & Yusuf, R. (2024). Pengaruh Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence pada Behavioral Intention Aplikasi Gojek di Kabupaten Garut. 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56855/analysis.v2i1.908

Bajunaied, K., Hussin, N., & Kamarudin, S. (2023). Behavioral intention to adopt FinTech services: An extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100010

Cakrabumi, O., Aji, S., Achiria, S., & Tesis, M. M. (2021). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Ekonomi Islam Terhadap Minat Investasi Saham Syariah di Kalangan Generasi Z: Dengan Model UTAUT Perspektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi Pada Kota Surakarta)

Dajani, D., & Abu Hegleh, A. S. (2019). Behavior intention of animation usage among university students. Heliyon, 5(10), e02536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02536

Fedorko, I., Bacik, R., & Gavurova, B. (2021). Effort expectancy and social influence factors as main determinants of performance expectancy using electronic banking. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.03

Indah, M., & Agustin, H. (2019). Penerapan Model UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) untuk Memahami Niat dan Perilaku Aktual Pengguna Go-Pay di Kota Padang. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(4). http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/issue/view/16

Martawidjaja, H., Hendriana, D., Budiarto, E., Baskoro, G., Soetomo, M. A. A., & Nasution, H. (2021). Procurement Framework Analysis and Evaluation of E-procurement Implementation Adoption using UTAUT Model.

Meida, L., & Trifiyanto, K. (2022). Pengaruh Perceived Trust dan Perceived Risk Terhadap Behavioral Intention dengan Perceived Ease of Use sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Manajemen, 4(2). https://jurnal.universitasputrabangsa.ac.id/index.php/jimmba/index

Odelia, F. (2024). Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi Spotify. Jma, 2(2), 3031–5220.

Oktavia, A. D., Inan, D. I., Wurarah, R. N., & Fenetiruma, O. A. (2024). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Adopsi E-Wallet di Papua Barat: Extended UTAUT 2 dan Perceived Risk. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 4(2), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v4i2.1277

Putu, G., Permana, L., Ayu, A. A., & Parasari, I. (2019). Pengaruh Hedonic Motivation, Social Influence, dan Perceived Enjoyment terhadap Penggunaan Marketplace pada UMKM di Bali: Studi Kasus pada HIPMI Provinsi Bali. 4(1).

Rahi, S., Othman Mansour, M. M., Alghizzawi, M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032

Rahmi, Y., & Frinaldi, A. (2020). The Effect of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Condition on Management of Communities-Based Online Report Management in Padang Pariaman District. 458 (Icssgt 2019), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200803.059

Rizkalla, N., Tannady, H., & Bernando, R. (2023). Analysis of the influence of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and attitude toward behavior on intention to adopt live.on. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6 (Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023spe017

Rizally, D., Sakti, D. P. B., & Muhsaf, S. A. (2023). Pengaruh UTAUT Terhadap Behavioral Intention yang di Mediasi oleh Use Behaviour SIMRS RSUD Kota Mataram. Empiricism Journal, 4(1), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.36312/EJ.V4I1.1332

Setyawati, R. E. (2020). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use Terhadap Behavioral Intention to Use dengan Attitude Towards Using Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus pada GoPay di Kota Yogyakarta). Jurnal Ekobis Dewantara, 3(1).

Soetam, R. W. (2022). Teori Dasar Technology Acceptance Model. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7754254

Sung, H.-N., Jeong, D.-Y., Jeong, Y.-S., & Shin, J.-I. (2015). The Effects of Self-Efficacy and Social Influence on Behavioral Intention in Mobile Learning Service. 103 (Education), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.103.06

Utomo, P., Kurniasari, F., & Purnamaningsih, P. (2021). The Effects of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Facilitating Condition, and Habit on Behavior Intention in Using Mobile Healthcare Application. International Journal of Community Service & Engagement, 2(4).

Venkatesh, V. (2022). Viswanath Venkatesh Pamplin College of Business Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061, USA. Annals of Operations Research, 308, 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9

Zhao, Y., & Bacao, F. (2020). What factors determining customer continuingly using food delivery apps during 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic period? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102683

Downloads

Published

2024-12-17

Issue

Section

Articles